← All projects

Materials & devices · AFM surface characterisation

AFM surface characterisation

How rough is a surface—and at what scale?

Project account · methods and observations from my study and research notes.

01 / The question

How rough is a surface—and at what scale?

A surface roughness value depends on where and how it is measured. This project studied the topography of SiGe layers on silicon across samples and scan sizes.

Scan a surface → Measure roughness → Compare scales
Conceptual illustration of the approach

02 / The intuition

A mechanism worth testing.

Compare measurements across length scales rather than treating one scan as the whole surface.

03 / The work

Inside the method.

Explore each part of the approach.

01Set up the measurement

The work included sample positioning, probe approach and optical-feedback alignment.

02Acquire topography

AFM images provided height information over different scan areas.

03Analyse scale dependence

RMS roughness and spectral analysis were used to compare surface texture and spatial structure.

04 / The observations

What emerged.

The notes report variation between samples and with scan area, highlighting measurement scale as part of the interpretation.

This account is based on recorded project notes. Original reports, figures and datasets are not embedded here.

05 / The limits

Where the evidence stops.

Original height maps, preprocessing choices and instrument calibration are required to substantiate roughness or periodicity values.

The academic foundations

Where this work connects.

Materials & nanotechnologyPhysics & applied physics
Explore another projectA phantom finger for sensing ↗